57.8 F
Los Angeles
Friday, November 22, 2024

Trump Lawyer Resigns One Day Before Trial To Begin

Joseph Tacopina has filed with the courts that he will not represent Donald J. Trump. The E. Jean Carroll civil case is schedule to begin Tuesday January 16,...

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan Issues Order RE Postponement

On May 9, 2023, a jury found Donald J. Trump liable for sexual assault and defamation. The jury awarded Ms. Carroll $5 million in damages. Seven months ago,...

ASUS Announces 2023 Vivobook Classic Series

On April 7, 2023, ASUS introduced five new models in the 2023 Vivobook Classic series of laptops. The top laptops in the series use the 13th Gen Intel® Core™...
StaffIncremental BloggerSchool Board Policy Choices about Mobile PC Learning

School Board Policy Choices about Mobile PC Learning

This is the fourth in a series of excerpts from a manuscript soon to be released. It’s a follow-up to the excerpt “What’s in it for me to use a mobile PC in school?”

An increasing number of board of education members and other responsible school entities around the world are authorizing educators to use mobile PCs in their schools. These policies reflect board members’ collective values and action about what instructional tools educators may use today and what consequences students will likely earn with these tools. Implicitly, school board policies authorizing mobile PCs in schools address the following distinctions from conventional instructional policy making:

1. They compare customary linear projections of instructional consequences for students with alternative procedures and tools. They concentrate on relationships among probabilities, their cross-impacts, and their possible implications of such influences.

2. They point to more alternative courses of action than conventional practice includes. They rank improved consequences for students above staying the course.

3. They anticipate and plan different concepts from using tomorrow an improvement of today’s educational practices and models.

4. They rely more heavily on the rational study of anticipated developments in technology and their consequences for student learning. This gives less attention to statistical projections of current practices and programs into tomorrow.

5. They give priority to reviewing the probabilistic environment in which alternative consequences and possibilities for learning before making policy decisions.

In sum, the focus in policy making is upon likely consequences for students with electronic instructional and learning tools rather than on refining past instructional policies.

Implicitly, users of mobile PCs and other advanced electronic technologies offer a comparison with conventional judgments and practices of educators offering traditional schooling.

Source of excerpt: Heiny, R., et al. (2007). Mobile PCs in Schools. (Released soon on TabletPCPost.com) (This is an unedited excerpt.)

Robert Heiny
Robert Heinyhttp://www.robertheiny.com
Robert W. Heiny, Ph.D. is a retired professor, social scientist, and business partner with previous academic appointments as a public school classroom teacher, senior faculty, or senior research member, and administrator. Appointments included at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Peabody College and the Kennedy Center now of Vanderbilt University; and Brandeis University. Dr. Heiny also served as Director of the Montana Center on Disabilities. His peer reviewed contributions to education include publication in The Encyclopedia of Education (1971), and in professional journals and conferences. He served s an expert reviewer of proposals to USOE, and on a team that wrote plans for 12 state-wide and multistate special education and preschools programs. He currently writes user guides for educators and learners as well as columns for TuxReports.com.

Latest news

Related news