62.3 F
Los Angeles
Thursday, November 21, 2024

Trump Lawyer Resigns One Day Before Trial To Begin

Joseph Tacopina has filed with the courts that he will not represent Donald J. Trump. The E. Jean Carroll civil case is schedule to begin Tuesday January 16,...

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan Issues Order RE Postponement

On May 9, 2023, a jury found Donald J. Trump liable for sexual assault and defamation. The jury awarded Ms. Carroll $5 million in damages. Seven months ago,...

ASUS Announces 2023 Vivobook Classic Series

On April 7, 2023, ASUS introduced five new models in the 2023 Vivobook Classic series of laptops. The top laptops in the series use the 13th Gen Intel® Core™...
EducationA Learners' View (ALV)Risk Oversight and Management

Risk Oversight and Management

(EduClassics.com Risk Oversight and Management INCOMPLETE AND UNEDITED NOTES)

Oversight and management of risks of learners’ failing to meet criterion include, among others, operational risk, reputational risk, and regulatory compliance risk.

Operational Risk: Instruction

The core day-to-day operational risk of a learner failing to meet criterion resides in the instruction offered. Instruction that addresses the two primary questions of learners is less likely to result in failure. These two questions are, What do I have to do? and What will it cost me to do it?

Learners’ First Question. To mitigate failure, instructors tell or show learners’ what to do first, second, etc. to meet a criterion for learning the lesson. Lesson planning distinguishes from and then combines learners’ steps with parts of the content that make up the lesson. Telling and showing can occur through direct instruction, through contingency management, or through both.

Instructional risk analysts (IRAs) use rates of learning to observe whether learners respond to a lesson as instructed. Rates require someone to count something. Lindsley (1960s) offers a protocol that demonstrates the power of counting and calculating trial-and-error ratios on subsequent learning rates.

… in one of five generic ways. Terman and Merrill (1960) used these ways to assess intelligence and achievement: (1) What is it? (2) What is it like? (3) What is it not like? (4) What is missing? (5) What comes next? Others use these generics also to assess learning.

Failure to meet a criterion for learning as planned for the lesson rests in the lesson plan and in instruction based on that plan.

Learners’ Second Question. Instructional risk analysts observe …

Reputational Risk

To the extent that learners fail to meet a criterion for a lesson, learners are assigned reputations and social status. The generic source of this assignment rests with how instruction responds to learners’ two generic questions.

Regulatory Compliance Risk: External Standards

To the extent that learners fail to meet state and other external standards, the source of this failure rests with how instruction links learners’ questions with those standards.

Robert Heiny
Robert Heinyhttp://www.robertheiny.com
Robert W. Heiny, Ph.D. is a retired professor, social scientist, and business partner with previous academic appointments as a public school classroom teacher, senior faculty, or senior research member, and administrator. Appointments included at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Peabody College and the Kennedy Center now of Vanderbilt University; and Brandeis University. Dr. Heiny also served as Director of the Montana Center on Disabilities. His peer reviewed contributions to education include publication in The Encyclopedia of Education (1971), and in professional journals and conferences. He served s an expert reviewer of proposals to USOE, and on a team that wrote plans for 12 state-wide and multistate special education and preschools programs. He currently writes user guides for educators and learners as well as columns for TuxReports.com.

Latest news

Related news